|  Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck (Argued 02/25/2019)
|
| Are private operators of public access channels state actors subject to constitutional liability? Advocates:
Michael B. de Leeuw, for the petitioners
Paul W. Hughes, for the respondents
|
| United States v. Haymond (Argued 02/26/2019) |
| Does 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by imposing a mandatory minimum punishment on a criminal defendant upon a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant engaged in certain criminal conduct during supervised release? Advocates:
Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the petitioner
William D. Lunn, for the respondent
|
| Mont v. United States (Argued 02/26/2019) |
| Is the term of supervised release for one offense paused by imprisonment for another offense? Advocates:
Vanessa F. Malone, for the petitioner
Jenny Ellickson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the respondent
|
| The American Legion v. American Humanist Association (Argued 02/27/2019) |
- Is the display and maintenance of the cross unconstitutional?
- Under what test should the constitutionality of a passive display incorporating religious symbolism be assessed?
- Does the expenditure of funds to maintain the cross amount to the government's excessive entanglement with religion?
Advocates:
Neal Kumar Katyal, for the petitioner in No. 18-18
Michael A. Carvin, for the petitioners in No. 17-1717
Jeffrey B. Wall, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioners
Monica L. Miller, for the respondents
|
Listen to other Supreme Court oral arguments from 1955-Present at Oyez.org
|
